Oh, those were such... innocent times.
Last year, I was posting a regular series of posts called...
I figured enough people were paying attention to Donald Trump and I knew (I just KNEW) he would sooner or later implode and someone else would have to be the Republican nominee for President and God help us, it might be Ted Cruz.
So it was my mission to remind the world at every opportunity....
Yes, those were such... innocent times.
Anyway, Trump has been so much shit as president, I almost forgot about the prevaricating pudding head from Texas. But in the aftermath of the tragedy of Hurricane Harvey, I have been reminded.... Oh dear Lord! I have been REMINDED (Can I get an "Amen!"? "AMEN!" Bless you!) that once more and forever he shall be....
Let's hear from Sen. Ted Cruz: "The accurate thing to say is that I and a number of others enthusiastically and emphatically supported hurricane relief for Sandy. It’s not right for politicians to exploit a disaster when people are hurting to pay for their own political wish list."
What brought this up is that Sen Cruz has his hat in hand looking for help for all those poor people who have been devastated by the storm damage and horrendous flooding from Harvey.
As well he should he! Good job, looking out for your constituents like that, you lying fuck bastard.
You see, back in 2012, when New Jersey and New York were slammed by Hurricane Sandy, a relief package came up for a vote. Much like the relief that Cruz is looking for to help Texas. But back in 2013, Cruz voted against the Sandy aid bill.
Cruz defended his 2013 vote, claiming the Sandy aid bill had "unrelated pork" and "two-thirds of that bill had nothing to do with Sandy."
But New Jersey Governor Chris Christie ain't having it. "It is an absolute, outright falsehood," Christie told CNN, referring to Cruz's "two-thirds" claim. His TV appearances Wednesday are the latest in a series of blistering verbal attacks Christie has unleashed against Cruz in recent days, raking him over the coals for wanting Harvey aid despite voting against funds for Christie's state when it was in a similar time of need.
The Washington Post, meanwhile, fact-checked the senator's claim and gave it “Three Pinocchios,” meaning “significant factual error and/or obvious contradictions.” The paper said the Sandy bill was not filled with pork and the majority of the funds supported disaster relief, contrary to what Cruz claimed.
Or to put it another way....
Along with Cruz, Republican Texas Sen. John Cornyn and 23 House members from Texas voted against Sandy relief. The measure passed anyway.
Rep. Pete King, R-N.Y., called Cruz a "hypocrite," but said he would support aid to Texas.
Going on Fox & Friends (but of course), Cruz continued to defend his version of events. “For folks who are focused on raising political shots and snipes about the Sandy bill, facts matter,” Cruz continued. “And a simple fact was that Sandy bill was over $50 billion, and 70 percent of it was non-emergency.”
I will agree with Ted Cruz on at least one thing: facts do, indeed, matter.
And here's a fact I hold near and dear to my heart.
Can I get an "Amen!"?
"AMEN!"
Bless you!
DAMN! I've missed this!!!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Dave-El's Weekend Movie Post: The Fabulous Baker Boys
With Christmas in the rear view mirror, our attention turns towards New Year's Eve. And for that occassion, this week's edition of ...
-
In last Sunday's post (which continues to trend in my blog stats as a highly viewed post for some reason), I addressed the departure of...
-
Andrea and I recently watched a video on You Tube on something called “ Dunning–Kruger effect”. What is the “ Dunning–Kruger e...
-
Once again per the demands of thousands..er, hundreds? dozens? OK, no one, let's do that #Headline thing in 5...4...3...2... 1...
No comments:
Post a Comment